I talk a great deal about startups, especially tech
startups, entrepreneurs and entrepreneurial communities. As I talk I often
speak of cycles in the tech startup world and technologies. When people ask
about the cycle of tech startups and tech funding my answer is often confusing
to them because they are unfamiliar with what I talk about. I like to mention
the Patterson Cycle to them; this post seeks to address some issues with the Patterson
Cycle.
Arthur Patterson postulated that the tech industry follows
an approximate 14 year cycles - 8 years of growth and 6 years of
"retrenchment". This pattern has held up since the 1960s. Most likely
the current cycle began in 2000/2001 (6 retrenchment years) and will last until
2014. The best time for VC returns are supposedly at the end of the cycle (the
next 3 years).
Every cycle has both a supply and demand cycle. In the case
of this one, it is the supply side (availability of great new companies) which
determines timing, despite the attention the demand side (investor money
sloshing around chasing higher returns) gets. The underlying secular forces of
creative destruction are at work at the bottom of the Information Technology
stack -eg 30% per year productivity increases for semiconductors, fiber optics,
software development methodologies, etc. Observably, these secular forces
require about 14 years to obsolete the existing order and set the stage for
most of the great companies (and IPOs) of the next generation. We'll see
hundreds of these companies pace the "new bubble" for the next few
years. Enjoy it and hope no macro events (the government) interrupt. -Arthur C.
Patterson
http://www.accel.com/bio/arthurpatterson.php
No comments:
Post a Comment